The effects of social media on adolescents’ brain development

Introduction  

Adolescence is a crucial stage of life marked by significant changes in both the body and the brain.  As young people navigate this transformative period, social media has become an integral part of  their daily lives, influencing how they interact, learn, and shape their identities. As an educator  and someone who would like to be involved in educational planning someday, I am deeply  interested in guiding both parents and children toward healthy social media habits. Given my  background in psychology, I strongly belief that education plays a key role in safeguarding  adolescents' well-being. Additionally, since this is a neuroscience-focused task, I will focus on  how social media can alter adolescent brain structures and functions.  

Adolescence is a critical period of brain development, marked by significant changes in two key  regions. The prefrontal cortex (PFC), responsible for impulse control, decision-making, and  attention, is still maturing during adolescence (Casey, 2015). The delayed development of the PFC  means that self-regulation and critical thinking skills are not fully established, making adolescents  more prone to impulsive behaviors and peer influence (Steinberg, 2008). In contrast, the limbic  system, which includes the amygdala and nucleus accumbens (NAcc), is responsible for  processing emotions, rewards, and social validation (Brenhouse & Andersen, 2011). The limbic  system develops faster than the PFC, leading to heightened emotional responses and an increased  drive for peer approval (Blakemore & Mills, 2014). 

Because of this asynchronous maturation of the PFC and limbic system, adolescents are highly  sensitive to social stimuli, peer influence, and instant gratification (Crone & Dahl, 2012). This  makes social media particularly appealing but also potentially harmful, as it capitalizes on these  neurological vulnerabilities (Sherman et al., 2016).  

The dopaminergic influence of social media on adolescent brain structures and functions:  mechanisms and risks 

Social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram are designed to maximize user engagement by  exploiting the brain’s dopaminergic reward system. This system reinforces habitual behaviors  through dopamine-driven reinforcement mechanisms (Montag et al., 2019). Dopamine release is  triggered by every like, comment, or notification, as dopamine is the neurotransmitter associated 

1 

with pleasure and motivation (Meshi et al., 2013). This reinforces continued social media  engagement, making adolescents more dependent on online validation. Social media also employs  a variable reward system, using an intermittent reinforcement model like slot machines, where  users do not always receive rewards (e.g., not every post gets likes), which compels them to check  their phones compulsively (Alter, 2017). This unpredictability strengthens habitual social media  use. Additionally, AI-driven content recommendation algorithms prioritize content that maximizes  engagement (Zhang et al., 2022), often including emotionally charged, sensational, or highly  personalized content, which reinforces the dopamine-seeking cycle and makes social media use  habitual and potentially addictive (Andreassen et al., 2017).  

The potential risks of social media on adolescent brain function include decreased attention span,  as the rapid, short-form content on platforms like TikTok and Instagram conditions the brain to  expect instant gratification (Firth et al., 2019). Studies suggest this reduces the ability to focus on  long-form tasks (e.g., reading, studying) and may contribute to lower academic performance  (Uncapher & Wagner, 2018). Social media multitasking further reduces working memory capacity  and increases cognitive load, making sustained attention difficult (Ophir et al., 2009). Adolescents  are also more susceptible to social comparison due to their heightened sensitivity to peer validation,  making them more likely to compare themselves to idealized online images (Twenge & Campbell,  2018). Excessive social comparison can lead to lower self-esteem, body dissatisfaction, and  increased anxiety (Vogel et al., 2014). Brain imaging studies suggest that social rejection and low  engagement on social media trigger heightened activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a  region associated with social pain (Eisenberger et al., 2011). Furthermore, social media overuse  has been linked to higher rates of anxiety, depression, and loneliness in adolescents (Keles et al.,  2020). Exposure to negative content, cyberbullying, and unrealistic beauty standards can  exacerbate these mental health issues (Nesi & Prinstein, 2015). Adolescents who do not receive  high engagement (e.g., likes, comments) may experience feelings of social rejection, further  reinforcing negative emotional states (Sherman et al., 2016). 

Implications for education: guiding parents and adolescents toward healthy social media use Neuroscientific research highlights how social media affects adolescent brain development,  offering valuable guidance for shaping education at multiple levels. As a learner, I recognize the  need for a balanced approach to digital engagement. With constant notifications and algorithm- driven content competing for attention, I see the value of developing self-regulation strategies,  such as mindfulness and structured screen time limits (Tang et al., 2015). Schools should actively  teach students how to manage digital distractions and prioritize deep learning over passive  consumption. 

As an educator, I would integrate neuroscience-based strategies to promote healthier social media  habits. Encouraging offline activities like sports, arts, and face-to-face interactions can foster  emotional resilience, critical thinking, and social skills (Uhls et al., 2014). Additionally, I would  create open discussions about the impact of social media, helping students analyze the curated  nature of online content and the psychological effects of social comparison (Fardouly et al., 2015).  Teaching students how algorithms shape their online experiences could empower them to make  more intentional choices (Bakshy et al., 2015). 

As a contributor to education planning, I see the need for systemic change in how we prepare  young people for the digital world. Schools should implement media literacy programs that help  students critically assess online content and recognize the psychological tactics platforms use to  drive engagement. Policies should also promote a balance between digital learning and offline  activities, ensuring students develop strong interpersonal and emotional skills alongside  technological proficiency. Finally, mental health resources should be embedded in school curricula,  equipping students with tools to manage anxiety, depression, and digital burnout (Twenge et al.,  2018). 

By addressing these challenges at all three levels—learner, educator, and planner—we can create  an education system that prioritizes well-being, critical thinking, and intentional digital use.  Neuroscience offers a roadmap for fostering a healthier relationship with social media, and  education must evolve to integrate these insights into everyday learning.

About the author

My name is Lucía Liting and this essay was developed as the final requirement for a neuroscience course within the Changing Education Master's Program. With a background in Psychology, I am keenly interested in the intersection of social media, AI, and digital education. The goal of this research is to provide parents and educators with evidence-based tools to navigate the digital world and foster healthy social media habits in adolescents.

References:  

Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us  hooked. Penguin. 

Andreassen, C. S., Billieux, J., Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., Demetrovics, Z., Mazzoni, E., &  Pallesen, S. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006 

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and  opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 

Blakemore, S. J. (2018). Inventing ourselves: The secret life of the teenage brain. PublicAffairs. 

Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural  processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych 010213-115202 

Brenhouse, H. C., & Andersen, S. L. (2011). Developmental trajectories during adolescence in  males and females: A cross-species understanding of underlying brain changes. Neuroscience &  Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(8), 1687–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.013 

Casey, B. J. (2015). Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent  behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych 010814-015156 

Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective  engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313 

Crone, E. A., & Konijn, E. A. (2018). Media use and brain development during adolescence.  Nature Communications, 9(1), 588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x 

Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2011). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI  study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134 

Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on  social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood. Body  Image, 13, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002 

Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The  "online brain": How the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119– 129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617

4 

Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media  on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of  Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851 

Meshi, D., Morawetz, C., & Heekeren, H. R. (2013). Nucleus accumbens response to gains in  reputation for the self relative to gains for others predicts social media use. Frontiers in Human  Neuroscience, 7, 439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00439 

Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2019). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse  from empirical findings. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 204.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00204 

Nesi, J., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Using social media for social comparison and feedback-seeking:  Gender and popularity moderate associations with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal  Child Psychology, 43(8), 1427–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0 

Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings  of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106 

Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2019). The Common Sense Census: Media use by tweens and teens.  Common Sense Media. 

Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The  power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to  social media. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673 

Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental  Review, 28(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 

Tang, Y. Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.  Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916 

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower  psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based  study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003 

Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive  symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and  links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617723376

5 

Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., Zgourou, E., & Greenfield, P. M.  (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with  nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.036 

Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current  findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9889– 9896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610792115 

Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media,  and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206–222.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047 

Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, Z. (2022). AI-driven content recommendation algorithms and their  impact on user engagement. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 13(1), 45–62.  https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00045_1 

Note: ChatGPT was utilized to assist in brainstorming and organizing the essay's structure, while  Deepseek was employed for generating and arranging the references section.